Recent research sheds light on the complex attitudes of young marijuana users towards quitting the drug – even after experiencing episodes of psychosis.
Cannabis has long been implicated in an elevated risk for psychosis, a serious psychiatric condition that severs the connection with reality. The recent study, led by Neely Myers, director of the Mental Health Equity Lab at Southwestern Methodist University in Dallas, delves into the multifaceted perspectives of young adults regarding their substance use, particularly cannabis.
The study, recently published in the journal Early Intervention in Psychiatry, involved in-depth Zoom interviews lasting up to an hour and a half with 18 participants aged 18 to 30. The conversations were centered around understanding the young individuals’ attitudes toward their substance use, with a particular focus on their views regarding quitting or reducing marijuana consumption.
One of the key findings of the study is the reluctance among many young adults to contemplate quitting marijuana, even in the aftermath of psychotic episodes.
Adolescents often perceive substance use, including cannabis, as a means of socializing and managing various aspects of their health, such as reducing anxiety or alleviating physical pain. The study emphasizes that while young individuals may view substance use as a coping mechanism, it can exacerbate their existing conditions. This paradoxical relationship between marijuana use and mental health underscores the need for targeted interventions and support.
The study’s timing is particularly relevant given the widespread legalization and normalization of marijuana use, contributing to a 30-year high in cannabis consumption among teens. With changing societal attitudes and increased accessibility, it is crucial to develop nuanced approaches to help young people navigate their relationship with cannabis, especially when it intersects with mental health concerns.
While many participants in the study acknowledged that reducing substance use, including cannabis, might be beneficial, they remained ambivalent about the advantages and disadvantages of doing so. This ambivalence suggests a complex interplay of factors influencing their attitudes, making it imperative to tailor interventions to the individual’s unique circumstances.
The participants proposed potential avenues for assistance, such as peer support that encourages healthier alternatives to cannabis use. Additionally, they expressed openness to receiving alternative strategies, beyond marijuana, for managing psychological or physical pain. These insights provide valuable cues for developing comprehensive and targeted interventions that address both the social and health-related aspects of substance use among young adults.
In conclusion, the study underscores the intricate relationship between cannabis use and mental health, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches to address the ambivalence young individuals may feel toward quitting or reducing marijuana consumption. With the landscape of marijuana use evolving rapidly, it is crucial to develop strategies that not only acknowledge the societal shifts but also cater to the unique needs and perspectives of the younger demographic.